» » An Enemy of the People: A New Version by Christopher Hampton (Faber Plays)

Free eBook An Enemy of the People: A New Version by Christopher Hampton (Faber Plays) download

by Christopher Hampton,Henrik Ibsen

Free eBook An Enemy of the People: A New Version by Christopher Hampton (Faber Plays) download ISBN: 057119429X
Author: Christopher Hampton,Henrik Ibsen
Publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux (February 26, 1998)
Language: English
Pages: 144
Category: Imaginative Literature
Subcategory: Dramas and Plays
Size MP3: 1405 mb
Size FLAC: 1964 mb
Rating: 4.2
Format: docx rtf lrf azw

Christopher Hampton's version of Ibsen's classic was first staged at the .

Christopher Hampton's version of Ibsen's classic was first staged at the National Theatre, London, in 1997. Henrik Ibsen (1828-1906), Norwegian poet and playwright, was one of the shapers of modern theatre, who tempered naturalism with an understanding of social responsibility and individual psychology. He has translated plays by Ibsen, Molière, von Horváth, Chekhov, Florian Zeller (including The Father), Daniel Kehlman and Yasmina Reza (including Art and Life x 3). Musicals include Sunset Boulevard and Stephen Ward, both with Andrew Lloyd Webber and Don Black. His television work includes adaptations of The History Man and Hotel du Lac.

Christopher Hampton's new version of the text is also a revelation. Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen was born in 1828. An Enemy of the People has been reborn as a passionate current debate about the value of the individual. The dust has been blown off the original text, and it will not settle for a long time. There is a vitality, vehemence and victory here against the odds. His plays include Peer Gynt (1867), A Doll's House (1879), Ghosts (1881), An Enemy of the People (1882), Hedda Gabler (1890), and The Master Builder (1892). Christopher Hampton was born in the Azores in 1946.

Authors: Christopher Hampton, Henrik Ibsen. Hampton has also written the screenplays for the movies A Doll's House, a story based on Henrik Ibsen's popular play, The Secret Agent and Carrington, both of which Hampton also directed, and Mary Reilly, which starred Julia Roberts. Christopher Hampton has received numerous honors including the Laurence Olivier Award for Les Liaisons Dangereuses in 1986, an Academy Award and Writers' Guild award in 1988 for Dangerous Liaisons, and a Tony award in 1995 for Best Score and Best Book of a Musical for Sunset Boulevard.

A New Version by Christopher Hampton (Faber Plays). by Henrik Ibsen, Arthur Miller. Published February 26, 1998 by Faber & Faber.

Sir Christopher James Hampton CBE FRSL (born 26 January 1946) is a British playwright, screenwriter, translator and film director. He is best known for his play based on the novel Les Liaisons dangereuses and the film version Dangerous Liaisons (1988), which received the Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay. He was nominated in the same category for his film adaptation of Ian McEwan's novel Atonement (2007).

This page contains details about the Fiction book An Enemy of the People .

This page contains details about the Fiction book An Enemy of the People by Henrik Ibsen published in 1882. This book is the 2249th greatest Fiction book of all time as determined by thegreatestbooks. Upon completion of the play, Ibsen wrote to his publisher in Copenhagen, Denmark : "I am still uncertain as to whether I should call it a comedy or a straight drama. It may many traits of comedy, but it also is based on a serious idea.

An Enemy of the People: A New Version by Christopher Hampton (Faber Plays). by Henrik Ibsen and Christopher Hampton.

Henrik Ibsen (1828-1906), Norwegian poet and playwright, was one of the shapers of modern theatre, who tempered naturalism with an understanding of social responsibility and individual psychology. His earliest major plays, Brand (1866) and Peer Gynt (1867), were large-scale verse dramas, but with Pillars of the Community (1877) he began to explore contemporary issues. There followed A Doll's House (1879), Ghosts (1881) and An Enemy of the People (1882).

Authors: Henrik Johan Ibsen Henrik Ibsen Christopher Hampton. Free shipping on rental returns. 21-day refund guarantee Learn More.

Norwegian Henrik Ibsen’s The Enemy of the People, first produced in 1882, is what we might now call a. .Through his dealing with this situation, Ibsen takes the story of the doctor and his town and makes it a symbolic critique of society itself.

Norwegian Henrik Ibsen’s The Enemy of the People, first produced in 1882, is what we might now call a whistleblower tale. Dr. Stockman, brother of the town’s Burgomaster, Peter, investigates the source of the resort town’s fortunes, The Baths, and discovers it is being polluted, and for the health of locals and visitors, recommends that it be shut down. I have never particularly enjoyed theatre, but the occasional play does stand out. This particular one is my favourite of all time.

An Enemy of the People concerns the actions of Doctor Thomas Stockmann, a medical officer charged with inspecting the public baths on which the prosperity of his native town depends. He finds the water to be contaminated. When he refuses to be silenced, he is declared an enemy of the people. Stockmann served as a spokesman for Ibsen, who felt that his plays gave a true, if not always palatable, picture of life and that truth was more important than critical approbation.

User reviews
The play itself is terrific, if infuriating. Ibsen did a terrific job illuminating how communities struggle to balance short-term economic interests with long-term health and prosperity, as well as the difficulty of having public debate about scientific issues when most people don't understand the technical details well enough to make their own informed judgments about relative risk and consequences. Replace "tainted water in the public baths" with "climate change" and you see how relevant this play remains today.

However, this translation is not great. It often reads like a transliteration, with clunky turns of phrase that may be more precise matches to the original Norwegian but don't sound at all natural in English. The result is that much of the dialogue in this translation feels overly formal and stilted, not the dynamic and vigorous discussions that I suspect were intended.
This classic Ibsen play is remarkably modern in content and theme. Imagine - a scientific-minded professional discovers potentially deadly toxic material in a town's main tourist draw, and the town tries hard to ruin him! Imagine - a large group of scientists agree that human activity is creating potentially deadly climate change, and the powers that be try hard to ruin them! Oh my.

So many people have been returning to Orwell's 1984, given the current American climate of charges of "fake news" and assertions of "alternative facts" and so on. I would suggest that this play also deserves a second look (or first, if you didn't read it in high school).
I bought the Dover thrift edition for $3 as opposed to the Arthur Miller adaptation (these reviews on Amazon are aggregated across both versions). I enjoyed the play, but while I sympathized with the main character, Dr. Stockmann, his intellectual elitism was too much for me.
This is a great story. I read it in college, and it stuck with me.I re-read it because of problems in the tourist industry of my hometown, which is causing serious health problems. This translation, while quite old, is still quite good and catches the flavor of the period.
This book, written in the form of a play, is as true today as when it was written. Don't let the fact that it is a "play" keep you from reading it! I never thought I would want to read a play either, but this one has changed my perspective on them. Rather than tell what the book is about, which ruins the story for me, I would just highly recommend that people read this. It's a good story with a good morality element.
Glorious play with a spectacular ending. Some of the lines are over-the-top, but in the context, they are perfect. For me, An Enemy of the People met Kafka's definition of how a book is supposed to be like an ice-axe to break the sea inside us.
Great allegory of standing for what’s right even when no one stands with you. Loved this book and would recommend.
Although I've never read or seen Ibsen's version of this play, it is evident that Miller is, as he puts it, "ventur[ing] into another's chickencoop". This work lacks Miller's distinctive air of mystery found in works such as "Death of a Salesman" and "After the Fall" in which subtle but devastating details are revealed slowly throughout the play until the whole stinking onion has been peeled. The course of this play is evident from the beginning. And even in a work like "The Crucible" which, being based on actual historical events, doesn't allow for so much gradual unfolding, Miller still manages to bring in subtle drama to engage the reader's/viewer's suspense. While this work is certainly filled with bombast, it lacks drama.

Dr. Thomas Stockmann is a knowledgeable, competent, and basically respected scientist. He is also rather liberal and known as a bit of a non-conformist and rabble-rouser. And he also has a wife and two kids to support. His brother Peter is the mayor of the town, the director of the Institute at which Dr. Stockmann is employed, and decidedly more conservative.

When Dr. Stockmann discovers poison in the town's water supply from a tannery upstream, he expects a hero's reception for saving the town and its major attraction, Kirsten Springs. And indeed, initially he is regarded as a hero, not only by his wife, but also by some allegedly radical newspapermen who vow to publish his findings.

But as it turns out, Mayor Stockmann and other town leaders have vested interests in the findings not being revealed. The repairs to the water supply will cost too much and take too long. Meanwhile, tourism, the town's major business and income source, will dry up.

Inexorably, the forces of moneyed interests begin to encircle Dr. Stockmann and his family. People who initially greeted his discovery with joy and predicted that it would bring down the wealthy bureaucrats begin to turn against him and side with the mayor and the other elites. Dr. Stockmann's position at the Institute is threatened. Townspeople refuse to listen to what he has to say and, indeed, refuse to even do business with him. And his mysterious father-in-law Kiil delivers the final blow by buying up cheap shares of Kirsten Springs in his name, making it look as if Dr. Stockmann set the whole thing up for profit and giving Dr. Stockmann (whose financial prospects are now in tatters) and economic stake in the springs.

In a Faustian bargain reminiscent of Proctor's in "The Crucible", Dr. Stockmann is given the chance to save his job, his "reputation" and his standing in the community if only he will renounce his findings. Will he take the "easy" way out for himself and his family and allow others to suffer when he knows the truth? Or will he stand up for what he believes in, regardless of personal cost.

Thy dynamic set up in "An Enemy of the People" is as valid and common now as it was when Ibsen wrote it and when Miller updated it. The book is an indictment of a society which will throttle its own interests - indeed, even its own life - to adamantly support the interests of the rich and powerful few. It is as relevant for today's working class Tea Partiers as it was for the people of Ibsen's small Norwegian town.

Unfortunately, on a literary level, this play does not live up to its political import. The dialogue is stilted, bombastic and exaggerated. Dr. Stockmann is an unlikeable, sexist, narcissist who, despite his claims to liberalism, can't be bothered to remember his housekeeper's name. His wife is all over the map, at times a strong and stalwart devoted wife, at other times piteously weak, deferential, and basically stupid. Mayor Stockmann is too heavy-handed to be believable. It is subtlety and subterfuge which win the population to support the elite moneyed interest at the expense of their own interests. Too much heavy-handedness gives the game away and risks rousing the common rabble against the elite. The other characters are either flat (Stockmann's children, Horster) or so conflicted and inconsistent that they aren't believable (the newspapermen). Overall, the book simply lacks the finely-tuned sense of character that Miller usually brings to his work.

The play is still very much worth reading, however, if only for the political message alone.